Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass add support for gdk-pixbuf cache update
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 20:19:44
Message-Id: 1378325970.3843.15.camel@kanae
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass add support for gdk-pixbuf cache update by Ian Stakenvicius
1 Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:48 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit :
2 > On 04/09/13 03:44 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
3 > > Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a
4 > > écrit : [snip]
5 > >>
6 > >> By gdk-pixbuf.cache , you mean the 'loaders.cache' file that the
7 > >> eclass is now continuously updating? Which ebuild is going to
8 > >> 'own' it?
9 > >
10 > > yes, gdk-pixbuf is going to own it since it is the main loader
11 > > provider and the package that provides the tool to generate the
12 > > cache.
13 > >
14 > >> Also, is it owned by anything right now? IIRC we don't try
15 > >> particularly hard to support FEATURES="collision-protect" in the
16 > >> tree, but rather FEATURES="protect-owned", and so if the file is
17 > >> currently sitting there unowned by any package, afaik you
18 > >> shouldn't get any collisions by installing over it.
19 > >
20 > > it is not owned by any package right now but touching the file in
21 > > src_install made collision-protect abort the install.
22 >
23 > You had FEATURES="collision-protect" enabled" or the default
24 > FEATURES="protect-owned" ?
25
26 the default, but since I only touched the file, maybe it's
27 FEATURES="config-protect-if-modified" kicking in ?
28
29 --
30 Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
31 Gentoo

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies