1 |
Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:48 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit : |
2 |
> On 04/09/13 03:44 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
3 |
> > Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a |
4 |
> > écrit : [snip] |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >> By gdk-pixbuf.cache , you mean the 'loaders.cache' file that the |
7 |
> >> eclass is now continuously updating? Which ebuild is going to |
8 |
> >> 'own' it? |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > yes, gdk-pixbuf is going to own it since it is the main loader |
11 |
> > provider and the package that provides the tool to generate the |
12 |
> > cache. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> >> Also, is it owned by anything right now? IIRC we don't try |
15 |
> >> particularly hard to support FEATURES="collision-protect" in the |
16 |
> >> tree, but rather FEATURES="protect-owned", and so if the file is |
17 |
> >> currently sitting there unowned by any package, afaik you |
18 |
> >> shouldn't get any collisions by installing over it. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > it is not owned by any package right now but touching the file in |
21 |
> > src_install made collision-protect abort the install. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> You had FEATURES="collision-protect" enabled" or the default |
24 |
> FEATURES="protect-owned" ? |
25 |
|
26 |
the default, but since I only touched the file, maybe it's |
27 |
FEATURES="config-protect-if-modified" kicking in ? |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
31 |
Gentoo |