| 1 |
On 01/02/2013 18:00, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
> No, they won't get anyone looking over their shoulder unless they |
| 3 |
> decide to neglect the bugs as few maintainers did. |
| 4 |
> I didn't see a lot forced removals caused by qa, did you? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
As far as I can tell, they come down to two: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
- webmin; which was saved after a masking and ended up not going |
| 9 |
anywhere, as most of the bugs (most security-related due to the nature |
| 10 |
of webmin!) were still around months after the unmask; |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
- ${forgothename} which Robbins claimed he fixed in five minutes and |
| 13 |
our QA was bad — where his fix was exchanging a build-time failure with |
| 14 |
a runtime abort, and thus was kicked just as fine; |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You could possibly add the damn squeezebox software that even Logitech |
| 17 |
discontinued, but for that I'd just refer to the previous flame which |
| 18 |
for my side boiled down "if you want to keep it around, mask the fucker |
| 19 |
because it's crap". |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 23 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives