| 1 |
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:26:47 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, everyone. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Here's my second RFC wrt bugs.gentoo.org redesign. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Right now we have separate UNCONFIRMED and CONFIRMED states for bugs. |
| 7 |
> However, we use the two scarcely. I believe it would be beneficial to |
| 8 |
> replace the two with a single NEW state. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Rationale: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 1. Most of developers don't care about the two states, and which one |
| 13 |
> bugs are in. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> 2. All bugs need to be handled the same, whether they were marked as |
| 16 |
> confirmed or not. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> 3. We stage bugs through bug-wranglers@ which kinda has a similar |
| 19 |
> purpose to the UNCONFIRMED state in other Bugzillas. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> 4. Some people who actually care about the two states change them, |
| 22 |
> causing unnecessary bugspam. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> 5. Some users who think that the state matters get furious about bugs |
| 25 |
> staying in UNCONFIRMED for long. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Your thoughts? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
CONFIRMED state is useful, it means that dev or powerful user |
| 30 |
confirmed this bug and gives it more value. I'd like to keep it. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Best regards, |
| 33 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives