| 1 |
Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Matti Bickel <mabi@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> From my PoV, editing ChangeLog is like editing history. Complete no-no. |
| 5 |
>> It is possible in all major SCMs for a reason. And I (as a user) would |
| 6 |
>> laugh at Changelog entries saying "um, I got that bug number wrong, it |
| 7 |
>> is really #1234". If I (as a developer) log such edits, I'm wasting my |
| 8 |
>> users time. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Its not possible in perforce once your change has been submitted. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Oh, missed that one. Maybe that makes perforce more "auditble" or whatnot. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I rather like the changelogs auto-generated. A method to link my git |
| 15 |
commit to bugzie would be awesome. I *do* envy debian and others for the |
| 16 |
auto bughandling they have. Previewing more than a raw number would also |
| 17 |
reduce (not eliminate) the errors committed, i guess. |
Archives