| 1 |
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 08:47:22AM +0000, Thomas Cort wrote: |
| 2 |
> So what I suggest is the following: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> "While it is desirable that the primary package manager be maintained |
| 5 |
> on official gentoo infrastructure, under the control of gentoo |
| 6 |
> developers, it is not required. During the path to becoming the primary |
| 7 |
> package manager, the package manager maintainers must be asked if they |
| 8 |
> would like their project to be an official Gentoo project. All rules |
| 9 |
> about projects apply. The package manager maintainers have the right to |
| 10 |
> refuse such an offer if there is a team of at least 3 Gentoo developers |
| 11 |
> that understand the package manager source code and are willing to deal |
| 12 |
> with bugs, testing, feature enhancements, modifications, and |
| 13 |
> integration." |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Maybe I'm reading it wrong but the above sounds like if there's less than |
| 16 |
"3 Gentoo developers that understand... ... ..." the package maintainers |
| 17 |
*don't* have the right to refuse and magically get sucked into Gentoo |
| 18 |
whether they like it or not? |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives