1 |
Patrick Lauer: |
2 |
> On Sunday 31 August 2014 11:39:22 hasufell wrote: |
3 |
>> Martin Vaeth: |
4 |
>>> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On 08/30/2014 02:35 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> For net-im/skype, |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> Screw skype. |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> Please don't. Not all communication partners are linux users. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Tox is multiplatform. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>>>> We have tox [1] on the way. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> This is far from being ready, especially for non-specialists. |
17 |
>>> It is not even foreseeable whether the Android client will ever |
18 |
>>> be able to do at least audio. (So far, I was not even able to |
19 |
>>> exchange any messages at all. It may be my mistakes, but |
20 |
>>> if I am not able to do it, how could I expect this from casual |
21 |
>>> computer users?) |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> This has nothing to do with specialists. Tox is configuration-free. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> And sure, it's pre-alpha as indicated in my previous mail. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> So it doesn't work, |
28 |
|
29 |
Wrong, it already works for a lot of people. |
30 |
|
31 |
> but you feel the need to feel superior by telling everyone |
32 |
> else that they are doing it wrong. |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
The fuq? |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
I felt the need to tell people about an upcoming alternative for skype. |
39 |
If you have a problem with that... troll somewhere else. |