From: | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf | ||
Date: | Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:46:04 | ||
Message-Id: | 511788EE.1010307@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf by Pacho Ramos |
1 | On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
2 | > # Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> (10 Feb 2013) |
3 | > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with |
4 | > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old |
5 | > # version in the tree, people should move to sci overlay one (#424659). |
6 | > # Removal in a month. |
7 | > sci-visualization/paraview |
8 | |
9 | So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we remove |
10 | packages now, remove features from other packages because of that |
11 | (openfoam) and then ... tell users to use an overlay? |
12 | |
13 | Somehow this appears not well thought out to me. Would anyone be |
14 | terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly overlay? (And any other |
15 | overlays that look like they are fun) |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf | "Tomáš Chvátal" <tomas.chvatal@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf | Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net> |