1 |
On 05/08/18 18:24, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 1:01 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Part of my frustration is that seemingly "anything open source related |
5 |
>> can be held in Gentoo" and I'm somewhat against that as I feel it |
6 |
>> dilutes the Gentoo mission. We are here to make a distribution, not |
7 |
>> maintain random libraries. If you want to do that feel free; but I |
8 |
>> don't see a need for that work to be associated with Gentoo. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> Honestly, other than maybe some prestige I don't really get the point |
11 |
> of hosting random software in Gentoo either. These days getting a |
12 |
> repo on github or any of its 47 competitors is a few clicks. You have |
13 |
> zero overhead from a governance standpoint, and a dev can of course |
14 |
> stick ebuilds in the main repository with zero interference. It seems |
15 |
> a lot cleaner from a copyright/etc standpoint as well. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Even openrc is hosted outside of Gentoo these days, which makes perfect sense. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> With the distro as a whole it is a bit more complex, though honestly |
20 |
> I'd love to see us get to a point where the whole thing can be |
21 |
> SECURELY hosted entirely off-infra as well, even if we still chose to |
22 |
> run our own infra. I just see it as a way to both provide options to |
23 |
> our users and ourselves. For the latter, being able to host anything |
24 |
> on an outside service means that if some component of infra goes down |
25 |
> we could have mirrors already running and pulling from infra, or if |
26 |
> for some reason somebody sues us or roots us or whatever we can pick |
27 |
> up and move without much fuss. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Running your own wiki/bugzilla/lists/etc was about the only way to do |
30 |
> things in the 90s/etc, but these days there are other options... |
31 |
> |
32 |
"Cloud-based Gentoo" - yeah I see *absolutely no issues* with this ... |
33 |
|
34 |
</sarcasm> |