Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:33:28
Message-Id: 20060825172747.GC15870@superlupo.rechner
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:35:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:25:53 +0200 Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>
3 > wrote:
4 > | So if by breaking the keyword someone breaks a policy, it is something
5 > | devrel should and will deal with.
6 >
7 > Should, sure. Care to back up the will part?
8
9 Time travel is not possible, so i am not able to present you hard
10 evidence.
11
12 What i can assure you is that there is a policy that says so, and that
13 policies are there to be followed.
14 There also was one case of policy violation that resulted in a devrel
15 bug, and the issue was resolved (further details are dev restricted in
16 bugzilla iirc and i really don't want to name details, bug number or
17 names not to turn that into a witch hunt).
18
19 cheers,
20 Wernfried
21
22 --
23 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
24 Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
25 IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>