Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:41:22
Message-Id: CAGfcS_nH0Gh-dFn-0XGqRMjFyc7FN+8soxmQDfpzEBTihs+j=A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules by Tom Wijsman
1 On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote:
2 > Well, that package maintainers are called developers on Gentoo isn't
3 > helping the interpretation here; regardless of how one defines those,
4 > both maintainers and PM implementers have to be taken into account here.
5 >
6 > From quick thoughts the latter are a bit more affected than the former,
7 > but perhaps Patrick can highlight what he sees as a burden.
8
9 You would think, but the reason I raised the question was that
10 historically every time this has come up the package manager
11 maintainers usually chime in and say that they don't consider it a
12 problem. I want to do whatever I can to make them happy since we are
13 so desperately in need of more of them, but...
14
15 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>