1 |
Steve Dibb wrote: |
2 |
> Michael Krelin wrote: |
3 |
>>> If you're feeling ambitious, it might be more appropriate to change that |
4 |
>>> use flag to ``ps: Add support for postscript'' so that it describes the |
5 |
>>> functionality rather than the package providing that functionality. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Isn't less ambiguous 'postscript' even better? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I was thinking the same thing. Why don't we just change the use flag as |
10 |
> well? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Steve |
13 |
|
14 |
I like 'postscript' because it's much more descriptive. 'ps' is vague as |
15 |
is 'gs'. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> |
20 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ |