| 1 |
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:40 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> An effective SDEPEND implementation is definitely nowhere close |
| 4 |
> to simple. Nor is presenting those dependencies to users. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Indeed it's not, but we *do* have a reference implementation and lots |
| 7 |
of practical experience with it, and we have worked out all the |
| 8 |
difficulties. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Having said that, if we're going with suggested dependencies for EAPI 5 |
| 11 |
(which I strongly suspect won't happen, since we seem to be wanting |
| 12 |
EAPI 5 now rather than in several years time...) then there's a lot |
| 13 |
more to getting it right than is mentioned in the original post, and it |
| 14 |
needs to be written up properly. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives