Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Rhinelander <jason@××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming repoman check will fail on large files in the tree
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:53:24
Message-Id: 410955B0.1030301@gossamer-threads.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming repoman check will fail on large files in the tree by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Thursday 29 July 2004 05:52 am, Brian Harring wrote:
3 >
4 >>Policy states files over 20k are not to be commited- I'll be committing
5 >>the logic to enforce this shortly- files over 20k will be viewed by
6 >>repoman as a failed check.
7 >
8 > just so you guys know, the answer is NOT to compress them and add them back
9 > into the tree
10
11 There seem to be rather a lot of those already:
12
13 find /usr/portage/*-* -regex '.*\.\(tgz\|tbz2\|gz\|bz2\)'
14
15 Is there a specific policy about not having compressed file in the tree?
16 If I'm not mistaken, a gz'ed or bz2'ed file in portage is sort of
17 pointless, since the rsync enables compression. Maybe repoman could
18 complain about .gz, .bz2, .tgz, or .tbz2 files in the tree as well?
19
20 -- Jason Rhinelander
21 -- Gossamer Threads, Inc.
22
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming repoman check will fail on large files in the tree Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>