Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o>
To: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 20:36:00
Message-Id: 20170226213533.242eddce@abudhabi.paradoxon.rec
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers by Rich Freeman
1 On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:32:56 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote:
2
3 >On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler
4 ><polynomial-c@g.o> wrote:
5 >> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
6 >>
7 >>>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler:
8 >>>> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_
9 >>>> do any harm and I don't understand why people want it to be
10 >>>> removed so badly.
11 >>>> Now QA again wants to do a questionable action _without_ any
12 >>>> approval from neither infra nor council.
13 >>>[snip]
14 >>>
15 >>>October 2014 council meeting:
16 >>>
17 >>>Can we drop CVS headers post-migration?
18 >>>Aye: blueness, creffett (proxy for ulm), dberkholz, dilfridge,
19 >>>radhermit, rich0, williamh
20 >>>
21 >>
22 >> $Id$ is _NOT_ the CVS header.
23 >>
24 >
25 >Do we really need to put it on the Council agenda just so that the
26 >same group of people can approve it again?
27 >
28
29 Yes please. I'd like to raise my concerns if this is really the only
30 way to keep this header.
31
32 --
33 Lars Wendler
34 Gentoo package maintainer
35 GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39
36
37 Attention! New gpg key! See
38 https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html