1 |
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100 |
2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
5 |
> > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
6 |
> > > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
7 |
> > > > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like |
8 |
> > > > herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think |
9 |
> > > > we should drop that herds and move their packages to |
10 |
> > > > maintainer-needed in a week or so. |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > > What do you think? |
13 |
> > > > |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: |
20 |
> - Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and |
21 |
> reflect reality) |
22 |
> - Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports |
23 |
> |
24 |
> The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages |
25 |
> to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want |
26 |
|
27 |
For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, |
28 |
removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping |
29 |
the herd. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Best regards, |
33 |
Michał Górny |