| 1 |
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:32 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 10 January 2008, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 14:37 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Implicit dependencies waste more time than pretty much anything else. |
| 5 |
> > > Almost all circular dependency issues we currently have are due to |
| 6 |
> > > implicit dependencies. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Maybe OT (an idea in a very early state): |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > For the implicit dependencies one could think of path-sandbox to help: |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Inform libsandbox which files are provided by packages both in *DEPEND |
| 13 |
> > and the system package set, and let it completely deny access to |
| 14 |
> > not-listed files. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Or let it report any access to not-listed files to help finding the |
| 17 |
> > implicit dependencies. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> it'd be quite some time before this would see implementation, but can you |
| 20 |
> summarize the ideas and open a feature request in bugzilla please |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
done: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205312 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
/haubi/ |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Michael Haubenwallner |
| 27 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives