1 |
Hey Achim, I was looking at using pgcc instead of gcc proper. So, I've |
2 |
hacked up the gcc-2.95.2.1.ebuild file. Right now, I have it checking |
3 |
if "use pgcc" is set. If so, then it'll apply the patch cleanly. |
4 |
|
5 |
Here's a list of the changes I've made: |
6 |
|
7 |
. if/then blocks for "use pgcc" |
8 |
. grap gcc-2.95.2.1.tar.gz instead of gcc-2.95.2 + diff file |
9 |
. commented out A1 & A2--they appear to only be necessary for 2.95.2 |
10 |
I will remove them from the final ebuild before committing if not |
11 |
necessary. |
12 |
. commented out A1..A2 patches sections in src_unpack(). Will also be |
13 |
removed pending commit. |
14 |
|
15 |
Is there any reason we don't build the texinfo docs? |
16 |
|
17 |
Could you please look over this and let me know what you think? |
18 |
|
19 |
--Jerry |
20 |
|
21 |
name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a |
22 |
phone: 703.599.6023 || matter of life or death... |
23 |
email: jerry@×××××××.org || ...It's much more important |
24 |
|| than that! |