| 1 |
On 02/02/2017 06:41 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> Responding here instead of the first time it was posted, just 'cause. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 02/02/17 06:35 PM, james wrote: |
| 5 |
>> " |
| 6 |
>> I'm not saying that we should have a minimal experience out-of-the-box, |
| 7 |
>> only that the base profile should result in an effectively-minimal set |
| 8 |
>> of USE flags. Adding IUSE defaults is essentially adding defaults to the |
| 9 |
>> base profile." |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Yes. More specifically, it's adding these defaults without setting |
| 12 |
> the flags globally, thereby not introducing system-wide defaults |
| 13 |
> across all packages but only those that make sense on a per-package |
| 14 |
> basis for that package to operate properly. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> IMO this is the effectively minimal-set of use flags we should have. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I... agree? We should enable the flags that are necessary for the |
| 19 |
package to work, and we should enable whatever is necessary to avoid |
| 20 |
REQUIRED_USE roadblocks. That's what I started out by suggesting. |
Archives