1 |
On 12/12/2016 09:49 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Mike Pagano <mpagano@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> According to PMS, @USAGE is required for functions. |
5 |
>>> This patch only touches comments and no code has been modified. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> PMS says nothing on the topic of eclass documentation syntax. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Any requirements are imposed by the eclass-manpages awk script. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Maybe you were referring to the devmanual (not PMS)? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Personally, I don't think it makes sense to add an empty @USAGE entry |
16 |
> for functions that take no arguments. |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
You're absolutely right, Mike. It was the devmanual. |
20 |
|
21 |
I'm not a fan of having an empty usage. As the devmanual is written |
22 |
today, it is not optional. |
23 |
|
24 |
I'll leave them in for now, and if the devmanual gets updated, I'll |
25 |
remove them. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Mike Pagano |
29 |
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project |
30 |
Gentoo Sources - Lead |
31 |
E-Mail : mpagano@g.o |
32 |
GnuPG FP : 52CC A0B0 F631 0B17 0142 F83F 92A6 DBEC 81F2 B137 |
33 |
Public Key : |
34 |
http://http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x92A6DBEC81F2B137&op=index |