| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:59:31AM +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 10.09.2020 08:35, Hans de Graaff wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380 |
| 6 |
> > Could you provide a rationale for removing this? The bug only has a |
| 7 |
> > single anecdotal report of a user who can run a desktop without it. I'm |
| 8 |
> > not sure if that is reason enough to remove this. I guess we won't be |
| 9 |
> > able to figure out easily how many of our desktop profile users are |
| 10 |
> > actually using LDAP, but changing this may cause surprises and I'm not |
| 11 |
> > sure if that's warranted. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Hans |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Hi. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> It is dictated by common sense. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I barely can imagine a case where you need ldap support in each and |
| 21 |
> every package you install. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> This should rather be per-package enabled as something non-trivial. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Maybe this change should be introduced with a news item just to help |
| 26 |
limit surprises? |
Archives