1 |
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 19:48, Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Based on the comments of the last thread on -dev about this GLEP I created a |
4 |
> new version. Please take a look at |
5 |
> |
6 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0016.html |
7 |
|
8 |
The new GLEP is short on how to actually implement these changes. What |
9 |
is the implementation plan for the *box-es, kde, xfce, etc. ? Gnome |
10 |
should be fairly trivial to adapt at this point. |
11 |
|
12 |
What is the plan regarding .desktop items, most of the current items are |
13 |
based on slightly older desktop spec. Do we plan to support those as |
14 |
well (the reference library implementations [12] & [13] don't handle |
15 |
them completely correct afaik) ? Also there are quite a few apps that |
16 |
use so called legacy .desktop files -the menu spec can handle those-, |
17 |
but is that what we want (i'd say yes)? |
18 |
|
19 |
In general i pretty much agree with what is stated in this revision, |
20 |
only the part about portage commands is a bit unclear, domenu & doicon |
21 |
should be functions for the few apps that do not create entries |
22 |
themselves. This happens almost never. |
23 |
|
24 |
The icon theme i don't really understand. Apps come with their own icons |
25 |
usually, i see no need for a reference (?) gentoo icon set. |
26 |
|
27 |
- foser |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |