Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:16:50
Message-Id: 4489BA11.5010702@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification by Peper
1 Peper wrote:
2 >>> well. A couple of examples:
3 >>>
4 >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122500
5 >> And again, you use my project of an example. Perhaps you should try
6 >> looking at something that actually supports your argument?
7 >
8 > I think it's an example of how user-friendly is bugzilla...
9
10 Yeah, exactly... I don't understand where did this idea of me using
11 someone else's own project against himself came from in the first place.
12 *confused*
13
14 I've merely posted a few examples illustrating that bugzilla and
15 attachments suck big time for new ebuilds' development. Or, why did you
16 switch vmware-server work to SVN if bugzilla is *the* place for all
17 this? Apparently it's not all that great, otherwise you wouldn't have
18 done that.
19
20 --
21 Best regards,
22
23 Jakub Moc
24 mailto:jakub@g.o
25 GPG signature:
26 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
27 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
28
29 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies