1 |
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 23:01, Arthur Britto wrote: |
2 |
> You've just highlighted one of the biggest problems with Gentoo: manual |
3 |
> problem discovery and resolution. When a package breaks, someone must |
4 |
> (1) manually discover it, (2) search mailing lists for Gentoo and the |
5 |
> application, (3) search the forums for Gentoo and the application, (4) |
6 |
> attempt reasonable diagnostics to insure the problem is not just with |
7 |
> their system, (5) if they are competent they might try to solve the |
8 |
> problem, and (6) share their problem with the community. |
9 |
|
10 |
We are taking significant steps to "fix" this, starting with better |
11 |
handling of our bugs (and more accountability of how they are handled) |
12 |
on bugs.gentoo.org. Several developers including myself are now fully |
13 |
caught up on bugs -- unresolved bugs get checked daily for new comments, |
14 |
etc. |
15 |
|
16 |
One of the major things that has caused this "manual discovery" problem |
17 |
is our extremely rapid growth, which resulted in many developers getting |
18 |
overwhelmed with bugs. Once a developer has more than 50 bugs on his |
19 |
plate, it becomes a bit overwhelming to keep tabs on all of them. If |
20 |
they don't get addressed quickly, then they can linger for longer than |
21 |
is acceptable. Our dev team is growing every week to address our rapidly |
22 |
growing user-base. (See our Gentoo Weekly Newsletter, bottom, for devs |
23 |
who were added in the last week.) |
24 |
|
25 |
Just wanted to chime in and say "we're workin' on it!" :) |
26 |
|
27 |
Best Regards, |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Daniel Robbins |
31 |
Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux |
32 |
http://www.gentoo.org |