1 |
Jan Kundrát napsal(a): |
2 |
> Matti Bickel wrote: |
3 |
>> It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which |
4 |
>> requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the |
5 |
>> previous had within 28 days. Another point is the "no patches" clause, |
6 |
>> which prohibits distributions from carrying a "significantly modified" |
7 |
>> ion-3 release under the ion name. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> So just rename the package to something that "clearly illustrates that |
10 |
> this isn't teh upstream Ion anymore!!!111one" and be done with that. If |
11 |
> users complain, ask them to talk to Tuomo Valkonen. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Cheers, |
14 |
> -jkt |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
Well, one could ask why we should provide ebuild for stuff that has |
18 |
apparently insane upstream, instead of just dropping such junk until the |
19 |
upstream guy realizes that the world doesn't spin around him. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Best regards, |
24 |
|
25 |
Jakub Moc |
26 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
27 |
GPG signature: |
28 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
29 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
30 |
|
31 |
... still no signature ;) |