| 1 |
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> I disagree. Resolved LATER is useful to some maintainers that want to |
| 4 |
> fix that bug, but don't have time or don't find the issue to be a |
| 5 |
> priority at the moment. By marking it LATER they're acknowledging the |
| 6 |
> bug exists and needs to be taken care of. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Reassigning the bug to yourself (or the herd) if necessary, accepting |
| 9 |
it, and then explaining what/who/why/etc in a comment is the way to go |
| 10 |
in that case. No system, however good it is, will replace proper |
| 11 |
communication. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Denis. |
Archives