| 1 |
On Friday 01 July 2005 20:53, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 01 July 2005 20:42, Brian D. Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Err... missing the point, and proving my point. Current portage |
| 4 |
> > _will_ fail because it's an unstated dependency. Why shouldn't |
| 5 |
> > portage be provided the deps it needs so it can figure out what is |
| 6 |
> > needed to get to what the user requested? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> BDEPEND is not going to resolve the case Mike shown. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> GCC bdepends over GCC to compile, you don't have GCC, you can't install |
| 11 |
> GCC, you can't install anything (a part from binpkgs). |
| 12 |
> But if you put GCC in profile, no need to depend on it, you'll always have |
| 13 |
> one also if nothign depends on it and the problem is resolved. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> BTW, as I already stated on irc, GCC is a RDEPEND not a BDEPENED because of |
| 16 |
> libgcc_s.so and libstdc++.so, so... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
No, it's both. You need to have a cross gcc on the compiling machine, and a |
| 19 |
runtime gcc (gcc-lib parts) on the running machine. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Paul |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 27 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives