Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove your modular X unmask
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:27:34
Message-Id: 1145542992.21629.19.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove your modular X unmask by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 07:05 -0700, Duncan wrote:
2 > * Overlay was doing strange thing. In this case it was SDL overlay as
3 > used by dosbox -- I tried rebuilding both libsdl and dosbox, but the
4 > overlay still failed. Maybe related to the ABI change?
5
6 SDL is being dumb with alpha visuals here.
7 Need XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1 env var for SDL apps if a composite
8 manager is running. That's for SDL apps, giving that to everything would
9 defeat the purpose of the composite manager quite a bit, I think.
10
11 I'll have to pass commenting on anything else. Not sure about the other
12 points and don't want to express guesses :)
13
14 > It's impressive enough to have me eagerly awaiting the next rc. Good work
15 > both here and upstream!
16
17 Indeed!
18
19 > Is the proposed schedule on the wiki at desktop.org still valid?
20
21 I think ajax is getting out his whip soon, if he hasn't already :P
22 The schedule should be pretty accurate on xorg.fd.org wiki.
23
24 > A couple more RCs, and release in about a month
25 > if all goes well?
26
27 --
28 With regards,
29 Mart Raudsepp
30
31 Project manager of wxMUD - http://wxmud.sourceforge.net/
32 Developer of wxWidgets - http://www.wxwidgets.org/
33 GTK+ port maintainer of OMGUI - http://www.omgui.org/
34
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Remove your modular X unmask Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>