| 1 |
On Monday 16 August 2004 09:47, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 04:21:22AM +0900, Chris White wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Is there some set policy on metadata.xml herd naming? |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > The most appropriate would most likely be naming herds after their |
| 6 |
> > bugzilla alias, so bug-wranglers and bug reporters can easily cc the |
| 7 |
> > appropriate herd on a bug. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Agreed; I thought there was an unofficial decision on this but perhaps |
| 10 |
> it might be good to have this listed? It's not only good for |
| 11 |
> bug-wranglers but also for developers who are assigned a bug that isn't |
| 12 |
> theirs. I'd rather change it appropriately than to shift more work onto |
| 13 |
> the bug-wranglers. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
While there is an option to specify the alias in herds.xml, I think in |
| 16 |
most cases it makes sense to name the herd after the alias. The only |
| 17 |
exception would be when one alias is used to manage multiple herds like |
| 18 |
kde does. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Paul |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 25 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 26 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives