| 1 |
On 5 August 2010 04:27, Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> If an EAPI adds a new global function that cannot set/influence EAPI, |
| 3 |
> PM's that don't support that EAPI will spit complaints about 'missing |
| 4 |
> command' during sourcing- however the PM will still see the EAPI value |
| 5 |
> is one it knows it doesn't support, and act accordingly. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You're suggesting a system based around ebuilds running commands that |
| 8 |
don't exist and ignoring the errors, which is a pretty blatant hack. |
| 9 |
While I don't think it's /absolutely/ out of the question, as I said |
| 10 |
earlier, I can see why some people would exclude it from consideration |
| 11 |
entirely. |
Archives