| 1 |
My concern is beyond me. As I stated I know enough about what to expect IF I |
| 2 |
use sunrise. But many do not and with it becoming official people figure |
| 3 |
it's gentoo and when it breaks Gentoo suffers. Gentoo has a reputation as a |
| 4 |
good solid, stable distro. As user and big fan of Gentoo I'm concerned - why |
| 5 |
couldn't sunrise have stayed unoffical like BMG. Why does it have to be |
| 6 |
official? Gentoo can choose to do what it feels is right and I will do the |
| 7 |
same. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I answered only because someone asked for user's concerns well this is mine |
| 10 |
and you all can do with the input as you please without any hard feelings on |
| 11 |
my part. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
On Sunday July 30 2006 23:42, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
| 16 |
> OK wait, on your servers, are you actually planning to *use* any of the |
| 17 |
> ebuilds in Sunrise's overlay? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> If not, how is it a concern? I personally don't use any of them, and my |
| 20 |
> system is running perfectly fine. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Let's not forget that nobody is shoving Sunrise down anyone's throat... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> |
| 28 |
> Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Brett I. Holcomb |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives