| 1 |
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:03:59AM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 4 April 2016 at 08:57, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > Does anyone still use the CVS $Id$ keywords that are in all ebuilds' |
| 5 |
>> > headers, or are they being expanded anywhere? Or is there any other |
| 6 |
>> > reason why they should be kept? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Last time this came up, a sole example case was mentioned, but it |
| 10 |
>> might have been buried. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557386 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Tracking this type of value to "track upstream" doesn't seem to make |
| 15 |
> much sense, and I think if infra was going to be able to fix it, it |
| 16 |
> would have happened by now. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> My vote is to nuke it and be done with it. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
++ - though as was pointed out this is a vote I've already cast before. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Rich |
Archives