| 1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
>> | Well it should. |
| 3 |
>> | |
| 4 |
>> | package.keywords package.use package.mask etc.. |
| 5 |
>> | |
| 6 |
>> | Where is the stability and consistency when we end up |
| 7 |
>> | forcing people to update /etc/portage files... |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Erm... Portage updates these automatically. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> as .cfg_** files. The end user still has to run an etc-update and |
| 12 |
> pray that it was not a file he/she had in masking. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Err, no? You don't need to run etc-update/dispatch-conf to get those |
| 15 |
updated on package moves. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Jakub Moc |
| 23 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 24 |
GPG signature: |
| 25 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 26 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives