1 |
On Friday 04 November 2005 14:38, Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
2 |
> Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
3 |
> > What is worse is that some |
4 |
> > users might not update for a prolongued time (6 months). At that time |
5 |
> > they will not find the information in the erata list anymore. But |
6 |
> > they will get the RELEVANT news delivered by emerge/enews. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Why would a "SomeSQL 1.0 to 1.1" guide ever need to dissappear? Surely |
9 |
> errata.g.o would have archiving/searching. But I do see your point |
10 |
> about emerge filtering out the unwanted stuff. |
11 |
|
12 |
It would be hidden in the forrest. Even if I did a search on SomeSQL, it |
13 |
might return a number of news items on SomeSQL. That is besides the fact |
14 |
that I have 737 packages installed. I'm not going to search news on all |
15 |
of them. Archiving would of course be provided, but searching is not |
16 |
usefull for updating. |
17 |
|
18 |
Paul |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Paul de Vrieze |
22 |
Gentoo Developer |
23 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
24 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |