| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 19/09/14 11:10 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I don't think there's any valid debate on whether git is more |
| 7 |
> efficient than cvs on fetching tree-wide updates :) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
erm, that was worded wrong, let me try again: I don't think there's |
| 11 |
any valid debatable point against git being more efficient than cvs, |
| 12 |
when fetching updates tree-wide. |
| 13 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 14 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlQcSCoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCU1QD8Dqy00yazdlXLphGYKx4e/Ec6 |
| 17 |
ci9AyvPI3ga+ilqmaJUA/RlsRM6ycPr6jXaW5WZtPTxjgfuz0qSrsw2cf+K7UjGK |
| 18 |
=p9XG |
| 19 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives