1 |
Hello friends! |
2 |
|
3 |
I am excited about Java 9. However, I am a very excitable person. |
4 |
|
5 |
Hopefully this is not a tangent, but the OpenJDK release is available |
6 |
on Ubuntu. I have tried to understand the IcedTea build process and |
7 |
failed, as I was hoping that it could be packaged for Gentoo before |
8 |
the official IcedTea release. I was not able to find a timeline from |
9 |
the OpenJDK project. |
10 |
|
11 |
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:41 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
12 |
<wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
13 |
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:42:59 -0600 |
14 |
> Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o> wrote: |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> You seem to know a bit about this, has there been a bug made outlining |
17 |
>> the troubles we will encounter as you know them? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> No, I feel I am already doing more than I should to help given my past |
20 |
> treatment. I have been making most issues with potential resolutions |
21 |
> know in #gentoo-java for the past ~48 hours. I have been spending |
22 |
> most time fixing stuff in my overlay. As I have been for over a year. |
23 |
> https://github.com/Obsidian-StudiosInc/os-xtoo |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
You focus on Oracle's Java? |
27 |
|
28 |
>> It's nice to have a warning, but sounding alarmist without concrete |
29 |
>> help doesn't actually help all that much. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> People have been asking in #gentoo-java about Java 9. I was simply |
32 |
> letting everyone know it would be some time before that is likely to be |
33 |
> the case. That alone was a courtesy to others. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> It does not take much to find out there are considerable issues with |
36 |
> Java 9 from most any web search. For anyone who cares, most do not. |
37 |
> Thus the present state of Java on Gentoo. Which I have brought up many |
38 |
> times over the past years. A new major version taking some time should |
39 |
> not be of surprise to anyone given that fact. |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
The Oracle binaries seem to work well for me and I have experienced no |
43 |
issues. Notably, Scala works transparently on the Oracle JDK 9. What |
44 |
kind of issues are you seeing? The biggest issue I have had is that |
45 |
some version tests do not parse "9" the same way as "1.8.0_152". |
46 |
|
47 |
Adding Java 9 to the tree would help users who are interested |
48 |
experiment with the language. As part of the first work on Python 3.5 |
49 |
(very minor) I installed it on my system but did not add it to |
50 |
PYTHON_TARGETS. Is there an equivalent for Java? |
51 |
|
52 |
> If you recall I got banned from Github over commenting on Java 9 early |
53 |
> access PR. I have also commented on another since. |
54 |
> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/1721 |
55 |
> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/6033 |
56 |
> |
57 |
> You can see the history of jdk 9 I put in my overlay almost a year ago. |
58 |
> That could have been in Gentoo. I maintained EA builds till release... |
59 |
> Dec 5, 2016 |
60 |
> https://github.com/Obsidian-StudiosInc/os-xtoo/commit/f90d8b21c39dbe8684e0951b845c43fae2ba6cfc#diff-0ecef02a46ed32d29b482614d71d229f |
61 |
> https://github.com/Obsidian-StudiosInc/os-xtoo/commits/master/dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin |
62 |
> |
63 |
|
64 |
That looks promising, thank you. |
65 |
|
66 |
> I have done all I can. This is the visible result of blocking people, |
67 |
> with no one else wiling to do the work. I am playing catch up now. |
68 |
> |
69 |
|
70 |
I have read the bug discussing your retirement. It is not possible for |
71 |
me to ascertain what led to disciplinary action. The lack of concrete |
72 |
discussion on behavior to be addressed reflects poorly on those who |
73 |
sought disciplinary action. |
74 |
|
75 |
However, I am not a very smart man. I am usually wrong. Hopefully |
76 |
someone who is much more intelligent than I can explain how I have |
77 |
erred in my opinion. |
78 |
|
79 |
Respectfully, |
80 |
R0b0t1. |