Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:23:28
Message-Id: 52147895.2080700@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies by Tom Wijsman
1 21.08.2013 12:17, Tom Wijsman пишет:
2 > On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:57:22 +0400
3 > Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> 20.08.2013 23:42, Tom Wijsman пишет:
6 >>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:29:09 -0400
7 >>> Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@×××××.com> wrote:
8 >>>> What manner of bitrot?
9 >>>
10 >>> They might ...
11 >>>
12 >>> 2. ... contain security bugs that later versions have fixed.
13 >>
14 >> There should be security bug on our bugzilla with quick stabilization
15 >> on it and(probably) GLSA.
16 >
17 > Not all security bugs are visible; the older a piece of software, the
18 > higher the chance that some people know about one or another exploit
19 > that the rest of the world does not know about.
20 >
21
22 True. But blindly bringing new versions into stable(without testing)
23 cause it POSSIBLY(without ChangeLog notes or CVES or whatever) contains
24 LESS security problems is not an option. Stable should be reasonable
25
26 --
27 Best regards, Sergey Popov
28 Gentoo developer
29 Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead
30 Gentoo Qt project lead
31 Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>