| 1 |
not as of yet. i think it'd be nice if we could have someone write an app |
| 2 |
that would take in fink package descriptions and translate them into |
| 3 |
portage packages. all the details for building are in the fink packages |
| 4 |
and maybe that app could be used across gentoo - might be an interesting |
| 5 |
idea [just keep it python oriented or maybe perl or something. i dunno, |
| 6 |
just spitting out ideas right now]. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Christopher Paul Taylor, Clemson University Computer Science Dept. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Joseph Carter wrote: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 13 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:07:39PM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 16 |
> > > when you say "open bug" whatcha mean? oh, and i need people to help me |
| 17 |
> > > figure out somethings with the source... i remember vlad from my early |
| 18 |
> > > gentoo-ppc days. i'll need to email them both... |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > thanks! |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Probably best if I get Portage working initially under OS X. I've started |
| 23 |
> > the port today and I'm not expecting that much difficulty -- should have it |
| 24 |
> > mostly done some time today. We can officially support OS X and make this |
| 25 |
> > into an official Gentoo project hosted on www.gentoo.org. :) |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Any plans to cooperate with the fink people on this? That might be |
| 28 |
> getting a bit out of the realm of what's normal and expected for Gentoo, |
| 29 |
> but I happen to think that portage is a lot better suited to building fink |
| 30 |
> packages than anything Debian's got these days. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> That's just my opinion of course. ;) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> - -- |
| 35 |
> Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@××××××××××.net> A man wrapped up in himself |
| 36 |
> makes a very small package. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> !netgod:*! time flies when youre using linux |
| 39 |
> !doogie:*! yeah, infinite loops in 5 seconds. |
| 40 |
> !Teknix:*! has anyone re-tested that with 2.2.x ? |
| 41 |
> !netgod:*! yeah, 4 seconds now |
| 42 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 43 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 44 |
> Comment: 1024D/20F62261F1857A3E79FC44F98FF7D7A3DCF9DAB3 |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAj7drcoACgkQj/fXo9z52rOSAgCghyuB6Iaz4vkSnHv0+KSGbvuF |
| 47 |
> XBQAn1TaA8cXFRuvkZGqWZy5tPE/VlJl |
| 48 |
> =WkKr |
| 49 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-- |
| 53 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives