| 1 |
On Friday 30 July 2004 03:54, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> I fully support this as long as I'm in said group that can commit on |
| 3 |
> these things or get a speedy response from somebody else that is. |
| 4 |
> If initially if it's going to be limited I'd suggest the base-system, |
| 5 |
> portage and toolchain herds. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I would personally like a new herd that is relatively small. The worst thing |
| 8 |
that I can see happening by having these functions managed outside of portage |
| 9 |
is that they become full of "if arch is this" or "if use has that". Adding |
| 10 |
that sort of code would enable quick fixes now but would make things harder |
| 11 |
to maintain in the long run, eventually creating a situation that is worse |
| 12 |
than what we have now. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Regards, |
| 15 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives