From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | ||
Date: | Sat, 28 Sep 2013 19:51:54 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130928205114.21c4a32a@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots by Kent Fredric |
1 | On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:47:52 +1300 |
2 | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > For that, a slot-dict approach is far more sane. |
4 | |
5 | The only reason anyone can make that claim is that no-one really knows |
6 | what slot dictionaries are or how they'd work in practice. Until |
7 | there's a rough description of how they work and a prototype |
8 | implementation, "subslot dictionaries" is like "magic beans". |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |