Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" <zerochaos@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ship app-arch/pbzip2 instead of app-arch/bzip2
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:28:29
Message-Id: 50E4DEB8.3080400@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ship app-arch/pbzip2 instead of app-arch/bzip2 by Pacho Ramos
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 01/02/2013 06:11 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
5 > El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
6 >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
7 >> <zerochaos@g.o> wrote:
8 >>> I'm confident no one would
9 >>> attempt to block my adding eselect-bzip2 to the tree (aside from my poor
10 >>> coding skills),
11 >>
12 >> ++
13 >>
14 >>> but would anyone be interested in blocking using lbzip2
15 >>> by default? It seems pretty safe and I've done dozens of full system
16 >>> builds etc.
17 >>
18 >> Why not just make it an option to start, advertise it by all means,
19 >> and then see how it turns out with volunteers before we make it the
20 >> default. Going from nobody-has-heard-of-it to default overnight seems
21 >> a bit much.
22 >>
23 >> Rich
24 >>
25 >>
26 >
27 > How this ended finally? :/
28 It ended with my setting PORTAGE_BZIP2_COMMAND="lbzip2" in my profile
29 and moving on with my life. I am very not good at eselect scripts and
30 I've not had the time to dig at it. You are welcome to work on the
31 eselect script if you like.
32
33 > Thanks for the info!
34 >
35
36 - -Zero
37 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
38 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
39 Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
40
41 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ5N63AAoJEKXdFCfdEflKdn0P/R9W6idHgpd+n7y5nyKQM9si
42 noHmFC6KHJSZJnjO8BlrhsN2HZrgZyPqPIlWLn5VwK+KcDTh0s1y4UGGh22a93qD
43 JodVbmmSJlnWA+EkzNloG+nTk1FxJYnmoL7o6/dhqv5x1Q/FD/xf0rAGCgTvDPSb
44 RuoMbCfkgSwZZlSSJtHr7Xd3w1psAgVemXNcG1C49AmnNrrmEkvawk5SNzg5Ruyn
45 UVMKSbLt1zEkRmUZHWS+lizN+GjFMVlaPEb6KK7ELbYWEMIjBihZ0WqdSWQ5Yxcn
46 yaZN9RTM2xel9tS+PEZjxwCBwb4ndXxuj51zK91WeTeWL+1wvwRXQ0nL+jFi3WfA
47 9nIHe26Cop5btYnCw2/5wlmKYReAxasql0ZVS8mrob5IgiptMIrxCAhCq8raJVZn
48 VD3+GiWzHYQRBUEkwQq/Qq7n7d5hgyd8l2/CCSgNUxmNbtFLoNWxPK5aVvEeb5EH
49 zyLH0eOQp4JA2ViZtnYgkviFRaEr9pa+Kc2S4BbvPTqYOX7Q7Ah2LMOw8uXQMefB
50 cNlVBa6ar5feAybWkmKH+c9n6mjAU9iCWyuoATSUMpSQ1dPmDnmKmxst4kARgMVK
51 Ou1F4mREQk7N23AqAnREF3b4RNLQqv6ff5GuxG4COjXZpIynFcm4o/x4nnzan6xr
52 ALCXZ5LIRk5D5K//oYJU
53 =yYs4
54 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ship app-arch/pbzip2 instead of app-arch/bzip2 Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>