1 |
Known problem, it is fixed in the unstable glibc versions. |
2 |
|
3 |
There is probably a bug open about it. |
4 |
|
5 |
I think it happened because libc.so is a shared executable which does not |
6 |
rely on libc and the lists got mucked up. |
7 |
|
8 |
Stefan |
9 |
|
10 |
Ajai Khattri said: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Can anyone explain this? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> # /lib/libc.so.6 |
15 |
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1252: dl_main: Assertion |
16 |
> `_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_prev->l_next == |
17 |
> _rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_next' failed! |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I am using 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 kernel and libc was compiled with nptl enabled. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> -- |
22 |
> Aj. |
23 |
> Sys. Admin / Developer |
24 |
> |
25 |
> -- |
26 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |