| 1 |
On Monday 26 December 2005 03:28, Chris White wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm not sure if we're on the same page as far as the target audience of |
| 3 |
> this change. The target audience is developers/those with strict in their |
| 4 |
> features. |
| 5 |
Actually "stricter", and there are way too many people to put that in without |
| 6 |
knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even sure. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> I've always found dodoc should |
| 9 |
> be checked anyways, and if we're assuming the documentation consists of the |
| 10 |
> formentioned items, then we're also having the situation of missing other |
| 11 |
> important documentation as well. |
| 12 |
Take KDE-related packages.. a good 90% of those have just the files I named or |
| 13 |
a subset of them as documentation, for those, the eclass already take care of |
| 14 |
them definitely. |
| 15 |
When there's something _more_, it can be dodoc-ed by hand. But it would fail |
| 16 |
if someone didn't put a NEWS file or a ChangeLog ... that seems stupid to me. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Also, I think jakub is totally right with this. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
| 22 |
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives