1 |
Dan Armak wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 20 October 2005 23:47, Petteri Räty wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>Every once in a while I see people wanting to use nosomething use flags. |
5 |
>>Why don't we have a package.use like we already have a package.mask |
6 |
>>file? This would make it possible for developers to turn on use flags by |
7 |
>>default in a way that would not cruft the base profiles for every local |
8 |
>>use flag. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Because implementing https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61732 would be a |
11 |
> lot more cool :-) |
12 |
|
13 |
Cool indeed. I did a quick search on bugzilla for package.use, but did |
14 |
not find out anything. Although I was quite sure that something like |
15 |
this was already proposed, but searching for my solution did not bring |
16 |
anything up. |
17 |
|
18 |
> |
19 |
> Besides, if the effect on portage's behavior is the same, what's the |
20 |
> difference? |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Well my solution is backwards compatible because older portage versions |
24 |
will just ignore the file. The solution in the bug would need the new |
25 |
EAPI stuff which is probably still some time away (just a guess). The |
26 |
package.use file could be used in the meantime and after the new |
27 |
features are available we could just move everything from the |
28 |
package.use file to the ebuilds themselves. |
29 |
|
30 |
Regards, |
31 |
Petteri |