1 |
On Monday 05 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:21 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
3 |
> > > Actually you missed the mark completely. |
4 |
> > > Nothing in the tree itself specifies what shell to use - instead it's |
5 |
> > > the package manager. So the PM on Gentoo/Linux/FreeBSD *could* |
6 |
> > > be /bin/sh and on the systems where /bin/sh is not possible to change |
7 |
> > > to a POSIX compliant shell then it can still use /bin/bash or wherever |
8 |
> > > it's installed. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > So "have the installed scripts to not require bash" is another topic ? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> No, it's a valid topic. |
13 |
|
14 |
he didnt say it was invalid, just a different topic |
15 |
|
16 |
> Either the profile could hook src_unpack or the ebuild could call a |
17 |
> function to do this |
18 |
> |
19 |
> sed -e '1 s,^#!/bin/sh,#!/path/to/bash,' |
20 |
|
21 |
fix the packages i say |
22 |
-mike |