1 |
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and |
2 |
future of the GWN at their next meeting. |
3 |
|
4 |
1. Reliability. The GWN claims to be a weekly publication, yet it |
5 |
frequently fails to publish without prior warning. There was no edition |
6 |
this week, and Patrick Lauer says that it is "unknown" whether there |
7 |
will be an edition next week as Ulrich Plate is AWOL. |
8 |
|
9 |
2. Permissions. Although it could be considered flattering that the GWN |
10 |
should choose a developer's blog as inspiration for an article, they |
11 |
should ensure that they have the developer / author's permission before |
12 |
quoting them (see previous complaints by brix, ciaranm and others). |
13 |
|
14 |
I also believe that when posting an article or interview, a copy should |
15 |
be sent to the relevant people to ensure that they are ok with what is |
16 |
being posted (my dev of the week interview, for example, was rather |
17 |
screwed up and misrepresentative). When someone contacts GWN to have |
18 |
something corrected, it would be appreciated were the GWN staff to at |
19 |
least deign to acknowledge receipt, even if for some reason they choose |
20 |
not to honour the corrections or post a retraction (although refusing to |
21 |
publish corrections is extremely insulting to those wronged). |
22 |
|
23 |
3. Misinformation, misquotations and outright fabrications. Sure, |
24 |
there's freedom of the press, but that shouldn't be used as an excuse |
25 |
for deliberately making up quotes and printing intentional |
26 |
misinformation. |
27 |
|
28 |
4. Credit. Care should be taken to ensure that crrect credit is given. |
29 |
|
30 |
From a PR perspective, Gentoo could benefit greatly by better |
31 |
utilisation of the GWN. I believe that as it stands, however, the GWN is |
32 |
discouraging people from contributing and damaging Gentoo's credibility. |
33 |
|
34 |
Another thing that concerns me is the way the articles are written. It |
35 |
is blatanly obvious that the GWN writers are not native English speakers |
36 |
as both the grammar and the flow of the articles is far from attractive. |
37 |
Having read through the archives, I notice that there was once a time |
38 |
when the GWN was a great publication, and I would like to think that it |
39 |
could become great yet again; in its current state, though, it is doing |
40 |
more harm than good. |
41 |
|
42 |
Lack of content and poorly written or incorrect articles are often |
43 |
justified by the GWN team on grounds of overwork and insufficient |
44 |
manpower. When I asked why they were not recruiting, I was informed that |
45 |
no-one has any interest in contributing. Upon speaking with others, |
46 |
however, I find that this is not the case -- people are interested, but |
47 |
fear (and rightly so) that their work will be edited in such a way that |
48 |
it is no longer something with which they want to be associated. |
49 |
|
50 |
Another complaint is that the GWN rejects any writing style which has |
51 |
any degree of character or levity. Any attempt at dececnt writing (the |
52 |
kind that would make it into publication in English newspapers or |
53 |
magazines, for example), is met with the claim that "the GWN is not a |
54 |
humorous publication". |
55 |
|
56 |
I would like to see discussion about the way the GWN is |
57 |
(mis)representing Gentoo, how we can better actualise its full potential |
58 |
and what can be done to address the concerns listed above. |
59 |
|
60 |
I have the honour to be, sir, your obedient servant, |
61 |
Christel -- conventionally stuck in the 1920s. |