1 |
can somone who's not dependant on Gnome 2 please try that too? I'm |
2 |
hacking some on the naut 1.0.x build to see if I can get it to work (at |
3 |
least build) in Gnome 2. |
4 |
|
5 |
though Im not that clear in the head atm.. |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
//Spider. |
9 |
|
10 |
begin quote |
11 |
On 27 Jul 2002 21:59:56 +0200 |
12 |
Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
|
14 |
> On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 19:06, Spider wrote: |
15 |
> > okay, I've done some testing on freetype 2.1.2 |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > On my x86 system, this build works with pango 1.0.3 and gtk+ 2.0.5 |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Could other arches please test? |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > Tests were: |
22 |
> > unmask freetype |
23 |
> > emerge freetype |
24 |
> > emerge -c freetype (no old .so's) |
25 |
> > run gedit : worked |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > emerge pango : worked |
28 |
> > emerge gtk+ : worked |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > thats about it ... more testing is required. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> |
34 |
> See if nautilus-1.0 works fine. It did not with freetype-2.1.0. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> -- |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Martin Schlemmer |
39 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer |
40 |
> Cape Town, South Africa |
41 |
> |
42 |
> |
43 |
> _______________________________________________ |
44 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
45 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
46 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
begin .signature |
51 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
52 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
53 |
end |