Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Freetype 2.1.2 test results
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 15:31:52
Message-Id: 20020727222844.63ff859d.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Freetype 2.1.2 test results by Martin Schlemmer
1 can somone who's not dependant on Gnome 2 please try that too? I'm
2 hacking some on the naut 1.0.x build to see if I can get it to work (at
3 least build) in Gnome 2.
4
5 though Im not that clear in the head atm..
6
7
8 //Spider.
9
10 begin quote
11 On 27 Jul 2002 21:59:56 +0200
12 Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> wrote:
13
14 > On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 19:06, Spider wrote:
15 > > okay, I've done some testing on freetype 2.1.2
16 > >
17 > > On my x86 system, this build works with pango 1.0.3 and gtk+ 2.0.5
18 > >
19 > > Could other arches please test?
20 > >
21 > > Tests were:
22 > > unmask freetype
23 > > emerge freetype
24 > > emerge -c freetype (no old .so's)
25 > > run gedit : worked
26 > >
27 > > emerge pango : worked
28 > > emerge gtk+ : worked
29 > >
30 > > thats about it ... more testing is required.
31 > >
32 > >
33 >
34 > See if nautilus-1.0 works fine. It did not with freetype-2.1.0.
35 >
36 > --
37 >
38 > Martin Schlemmer
39 > Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer
40 > Cape Town, South Africa
41 >
42 >
43 > _______________________________________________
44 > gentoo-dev mailing list
45 > gentoo-dev@g.o
46 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
47
48
49 --
50 begin .signature
51 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
52 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
53 end