Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives?
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:29:29
Message-Id: 44028D37.7000205@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives? by Lars Strojny
1 Lars Strojny wrote:
2 > I'm currently heavily involved with jabber-related packages. As a result
3 > I have to struggle with the really seldomn maintained packages in
4 > Gentoo.
5
6 ...
7
8 > To come to an end: jabber is not really the most unimportant thing, so
9 > things should go better. I want to provide my ebuilds[2] for Gentoo's
10 > main tree and I would also offer my help on jabber-stuff (if it's need
11 > and it's not just a matter of motivation or so). Anyway, it must become
12 > better.
13
14 You might want to talk to the maintainer and herd, not all of us. Or
15 even file a bug for updates -- some people are very busy and just don't
16 notice there's a new version.
17
18 $ herdstat -m ejabberd
19 Package: net-im/ejabberd
20 Herds(1): net-im
21 Maintainers(1): humpback@g.o
22 ...
23
24
25 Thanks,
26 Donnie

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives? Lars Strojny <lars@×××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] What's on with ejabberd and relatives? Lars Strojny <lars@×××××××.net>