| 1 |
Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> Once users have the full git repo on their machines, they have two |
| 3 |
> options. They can update it efficiently with `git pull`, or they can |
| 4 |
> update it with rsync by using `emerge --sync`. You can even mix the two, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I don't think you can mix the two, because how my local clone looks |
| 7 |
depends on when I run git pull. My local Git doesn't repack to match |
| 8 |
packs on the remote. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The logical contents will be equivalent but the underlying data |
| 11 |
structure will be different, so rsync only works the first time. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
FWIW I also liked the look of squashdelta. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
//Peter |
Archives