| 1 |
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:38:35 +1100 |
| 2 |
Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I even noticed some maintainers adding subslots dependencies on |
| 5 |
> libraries that do not yet define subslots. This too seems reasonable, |
| 6 |
> given that there would be no impact until the library defines a |
| 7 |
> (sensible) subslot in the future. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
By the way, this could also be discussed: I did not check, but as far |
| 10 |
as I understand it subslot is equal to slot if not defined. When said |
| 11 |
library defines a subslot, the subslot will change and thus triggers a |
| 12 |
(likely useless) rebuild of your package setting a := dep. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Alexis. |
Archives