From: | Kumba <kumba@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Possible Change in Glibc Versioning |
Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:17:35 |
Message-Id: | 40877FED.9040204@gentoo.org |
1 | I was made aware in #pax of a shift in glibc's versioning mechanism. |
2 | Most by now have noticed there hasn't been a glibc-2.3.3 package |
3 | released by GNU. I don't think there will be one. Skimming some |
4 | threads on the libc-hacker mailing list, the general attitude seems to |
5 | be letting the individual distributions take snapshots and decide what |
6 | is stable and what isn't. |
7 | |
8 | I haven't fully read the threads below, but here they are if someone |
9 | wants to digest them and figure out how we'll handle the versioning changes. |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | Nov 2003: |
13 | http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-11/msg00150.html |
14 | |
15 | Dec 2003: |
16 | http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-12/msg00033.html |
17 | |
18 | Jan 2004: |
19 | http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2004-01/msg00067.html |
20 | |
21 | |
22 | --Kumba |
23 | |
24 | -- |
25 | "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: |
26 | small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are |
27 | elsewhere." --Elrond |
28 | |
29 | -- |
30 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Possible Change in Glibc Versioning | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |